Reasonably Ascertainable Reality

Thoughts and musings on current events and other random occurrences.

Location: South Jersey, United States

Thursday, September 15, 2005

Catholicism's New Inquisition

Following up on my earlier post, here are some questions to be asked during the visits to seminaries in search of the ever dodgey homosexual, pedophile priest.

"Is there a clear process for removing from the seminary faculty members who dissent from the authoritative teaching of the church or whose conduct does not provide good example to future priests?"
"Is the seminary free from the influences of New Age and eclectic spirituality?"
"Do the seminarians or faculty members have concerns about the moral life of those living in the institution? (This question must be answered)."
"Is there evidence of homosexuality in the seminary? (This question must be answered)."
The questionnaire also asks whether faculty members "watch out for signs of particular friendships," the newspaper said.

Maybe we can hook the Vatican up with these guys (link is to Sadly, No--as Focus on the Family has removed the lovely article):

Evidences of gender confusion or doubt in boys ages 5 to 11 may include:
1. A strong feeling that they are "different" from other boys.

2. A tendency to cry easily, be less athletic, and dislike the roughhousing that other boys enjoy.
3. A persistent preference to play female roles in make-believe play.

and my personal favorite...

5. A susceptibility to be bullied by other boys, who may tease them unmercifully and call them "queer," "fag" and "gay."

Remember parents, if the local bully is calling your kid a 'fag'...its HIS fault, not that ratty-ass bully or his incompetent parents.

Once again, lets remind ourselves why these questions are being asked:

The issue has been in the spotlight because a study commissioned by the Church found last year that about 80 percent of the young people victimized by priests were boys.

And we all know, in the male homosexual view, boys = consensual homosexual males. I mean the ridiculously implicit assumption is the homosexual males not only have no control over their sexual urges, but that those urges are not just for consenting other homosexual males, but basically anyone who possess a penis, no matter the age.

Disgusting. The church should be ashamed.


Post a Comment

<< Home

Find an Attorney